Medical science comes a long way considering that the time of Vesalius' sixteenth century. Since then, scientists and doctors have revealed your machine that is the human body, and geneticists have uncovered the genes which contain our biological makeup. Just this year scientists have decoded the human genome, the complex code of life. But given our medical knowledge we aren't yet capable to conquer detrimental diseases like cancer, Parkinsons, and Alzheimers. These diseases deprive us not just of life but individuals dignity at the same time. Many diseases result from the disruption of cellular functioning or the destruction of tissues. While we've known concerning the destruction of tissues and cells for a long period, we've never, until now, known of an solution.



What researchers want to perform is to control this development process so they could tell the stem cell exactly which part in the body it will form. They have "recipes" they use which include, but are not limited to, injecting different genes to the cell, changing the chemical nature of the nutrients that "feed" the cell and so forth. But, no matter what they are doing, there appears to be no consensus that once cellular structure are formed into what the researchers want it to get, that it's going to cure anything.



There are serious ethical considerations, including the possible saving of lives that could are derived from embryonic stem cell research, the potential for loss involved, protecting the human being subjects and making sure there is full informed consent without undue pressure. This is always a concern where the subjects usually are not facing immanent death neglected, as could be the case in several cancer or AIDS treatment trials. Careful oversight is necessary whatsoever points. I believe that the legitimate questions are merely obscured through the people who insist that the embryo that may never be a person, that may never be implanted in a uterus, has every one of the rights with the people already alive and struggling with devastating diseases.



Recently the study of liquid crystals has shown some promise in success of stem cell regeneration. Stem cells grown in the laboratory tend to differentiate within an uncontrolled manner, resulting in a very mixture of cells of little medical use, but the Research Science and Engineering Center demonstrate that by straining mechanically cellular structure as they grow, it can be possible to reduce significantly and almost take away the uncontrolled differentiation of stem cells. YouTube.com. These scientists have recently found a liquid crystal-based cell culture system that promises new methods for achieving real-time treatments for interactions between artificial materials and human embryonic stem cells, including the possibility of straining embryonic stem cells as they grow.



How far will embryonic research go? Women become purposely pregnant so that you can sell their embryos for stem cell research. Since scientists keep promoting how wonderful embryonic stem cells will be capable of cure a lot of diseases, people may eventually want to clone themselves in embryonic form. stem cell hearing loss. This unborn human life will be sacrificed if there would have been a need by its living twin.



Ceregenex comes with some good man power. Chairman and CEO, Matthew Henninger, that has over 20 years corporate finance experience and President, Richard Anzalone, that has worked within the direct sales industry since 1992. No doubt both these guys understand specifically what they may be doing and therefore are well allowed to lead the company forward.



Looking at this situation from the business perspective, I understand that there has to be ownership, funding plus sources for cells to generate this possible. However, I was sort of annoyed because I feel that after God provides us a talent, we have to use it to assist others, guide them how to undertake it, and never worry about having the right to own something. We are common just stewards of the God has presented to us, and we need to share. Also, if more people know the way to do something, that should 't be as expensive so we would not need to bother about funding all the as they are.



The truth is the fact that cord blood stem cells (discovered in 1978) are drastically distinctive from embryonic stem cells in how the life has already been born before extraction (which is harmless towards the infant). This is also the richest supply of stem cells the human body has to offer, and is donated much like blood (Park 78). In addition, the donating of adult cells far less medically malicious than aforementioned. With proper anesthesia, the procedure can be done by anyone, to become a limitless way to obtain these cells. Though not as flexible as embryonic stem cells within the formation of organs and tissues, cord and adult stem cells usually are not immunogenic, easily produced, and harmless to both donor along with the recipient.